You might be wondering why it's natural to refer to this as a "square root". Well, let pk be the probability of the event X = k. Then the probability generating function for X is
.
Similarly, let qj be the probability of the event Y = j, and define the probability generating function .
Let Y, Y1, Y2 be equidistributed. Then X is equidistributed with Y1 + Y2 if and only if f(z) = g(z)2, since addition of independent random variables corresponds to convolution of distributions and multiplication of their generating functions.Conversely, the random variable X has a square root in this sense if and only if its generating function f(z) has a square root which has a Taylor series at z = 0 with all coefficients positive.
The simplest case is when X has finite support. Then X has a square root if and only if its generating function f(z) is the square of a polynomial. For example, the random variable which takes values 0, 1, 2 with probabilities 1/4, 1/2, 1/4 has a square root; its generating function is
.
But the random variable taking values 0, 1, 2 with probability 1/3 each is not, since 1/3 + z/3 + z2/3 is not a square.
But what about distributions with infinite support? Some of these are easy -- the square root of the Poisson distribution with mean λ is Poisson with mean λ/2. This can easily be seen since the probability generating function of a Poisson(λ) random variable is
.
(In fact, the Poisson distribution is infinitely divisible; in the nomenclature used in this post one might say it has roots of all orders.)Now consider a random variable X, with geometric distribution with parameter 1/2 supported on {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}; this has P(X = k) = 2-(k+1). This is a special case of the negative binomial distribution, which is infinitely divisible. We have f(z) = 1/2 + z/22 + z2/23 + ... = 1/(2-z). So the square root distribution has generating function
and in general the coefficient of zn is, by the binomial theorem,
That binomial coefficient is ${1 \over 2} {2n \choose n}$; we have ${2n \choose n} \sim 4^n/\sqrt{\pi n}$, so the coefficient of zn in our probability generating function, which we'll call qk, is asymptotic to
In particular, the "square root" distribution decays just a bit faster than the distribution that it's the square root of, the main difference being the additional factor of n-1/2. This is reasonable, if you think about the process of convolution. We have
pn = q0 qn + q1 qn-1 + q2 qn-2 + ... + qn-1 q1 + qn q0
and each of the n terms is roughly 1/(n2n). This is just another negative binomial distribution. (I actually didn't realize that until I started writing this post; the post was originally titled "what's the name of this distribution?" and then I did some research.)
4 comments:
Your comment about roots of all orders got me thinking--is there much use to the notion of the log of a distribution?
Cooper,
I can't think of one off the top of my head, but I'm not trying that hard. One might start by thinking of whether the convolution exponential of a distribution (which could be defined as exp(X) = 1 + X + X*X/2 + X*X*X/6 + ...) is useful; the logarithm would then be its inverse.
Post a Comment