(This is inspired by the fact that I taught this summer, and was paid for doing so, but because of the way my contract is written, my pay for the academic year is spread out over twelve months. As a result I got extra-large paychecks over the summer, partially for the work I was doing in the summer and partially for work that I had already done in the previous academic year or will be doing in the next academic year.)

For those not familiar with the US tax system: if your net pay is X you don't get a check for X, but for some smaller amount, because various taxes are withheld. Chief among these is the federal income tax. Now, the federal income tax is not a flat tax, but a progressive tax -- if your income is higher then you pay a larger percentage of your income in tax. Tax returns have to be filled out on a yearly basis, but most people get paid more often than yearly. So the amount of tax withheld is determined, based on the amount of the paycheck and the period that the paycheck is for, in such a way that the total amount of tax withheld is somewhere near the amount that you're expected to owe. (Most Americans actually end up overpaying through this system, and get a small refund back at tax-filing time.)

So say that if you make 36

*x*per year, then your taxes will be

*f*(36

*x*). Then you'd expect that if you make 3

*x*in a given month, you will have

*f*(36

*x*)/12 withheld, for a total of

*f*(36

*x*) over the course of the year.. If instead you make 2

*x*in each of six months and 4

*x*in each of six months, then in each of the months in which you make 2

*x*tax will be withheld as if you make 24

*x*per year, and in each month in which you make 4

*x*tax will be withheld as if you make 48

*x*per year. So total withholding will be

6

*f*(24

*x*)/12 + 6

*f*(48

*x*)/12

or, simplifying, [

*f*(24

*x*) +

*f*(48

*x*)]/2. Call this

*T*'. Is this less than or greater than

*f*(36

*x*), which we'll call

*T*?

We can easily see that

*T*' ≥

*T*if and only if

*f*(48

*x*)-

*f*(36

*x*) ≥

*f*(36

*x*) -

*f*(24

*x*).

That is,

*T*' ≥

*T*if and only if the amount of extra tax owed when you go from $36,000 to $48,000 is more than the extra amount owed when you go from $24,000 to $36,000. But since marginal tax rates are increasing -- since the tax is progressive -- this is true.

More generally, given progressive taxation, withholding is smallest for a given annual income if that income is spread out exactly evenly throughout the year. This is a consequence of Jensen's inequality. The more unevenly spread out the earnings are, the more money will be withheld.

In reality this is slightly more complicated because there are tax brackets, which are reflected in the withholding formulas, so

*f*is actually piecewise linear (see page 36 of this IRS publication). For example, a single person paid between $883 and $3,050 per month (after subtracting withholding allowances) will have $70.80 + .15(x-$883) withheld from a paycheck of x; a single person paid between $3,050 and $7,142 will have $395.85 + .25(x-$3050) withheld. (Note that putting $3,050 into either of these formulas gives $395.85; the amount withheld is a continuous function of the amount earned.) So if every paycheck is under $3,050, or if every paycheck is over $3,050, then the amount withheld ends up being the same no matter how the pay is distributed. But a person who makes, say, $3,000 in each of two months will have $388.35 withheld from each, for a total of $766.70; a person who makes $2,000 in one month and $4,000 in another will have $238.35 withheld from the first and $633.35 withheld from the second, for a total of $871.70 withheld.

I had known all this intuitively before this afternoon but I'd never bothered to actually write down why it is...

This all applies to people who make varying amounts in differing pay periods from a single job. People who have

*multiple*jobs can be burnt in the withholding process because we have progressive taxation; if you make

*x*in each of two jobs you have less withheld than if you make 2

*x*in a single job. If that's you, be careful.

(I'm not an accountant. None of this should be taken as financial advice.)

## No comments:

Post a Comment